CloseVector

Solutions / Internal investigations

Two accounts.
One record.

CloseVector implements a private AI search and evidence-investigation system for your team, configured around the facts you need to establish.

Discuss Your ProjectExplore the work
Site maintenance inquiryLocal processing
maintenance warning
SourcesWarningMaintenanceAcknowledgment
One day · all times in the same local time zone
Before 09:40
Warning sent to the project mailbox
Maintenance began
First recorded acknowledgment
The question to resolveWho could read the project mailbox before 09:40?
Search record savedIllustrative interface. Invented records.
One account says the maintenance team was warned before work began. The other says no one saw the warning until after. The record shows when the warning was sent and when the first acknowledgment was recorded, not when each person read it.

Give the evidence a fair hearing

Get past competing stories. Work from what the records support.

Compare accounts with messages, dates and documents before deciding whose explanation to accept.

The people affected deserve a decision grounded in the record, including facts that complicate your first impression.

CloseVector brings related records into a source-linked review, preserving context and open questions instead of turning a pattern into a verdict.

In the next interview, you can ask about a specific difference in the chronology, with the relevant message in front of you, rather than relying on a general impression.

Which account needs checking against the record?

Discuss Your Project

Useful outputs

Ask the question the chronology reveals.

Line up the accounts with dates and source references. See where they agree, where they conflict, and which missing record could clarify the point. A specific follow-up question is more useful than an unsupported conclusion.

A pattern may guide the next question. CloseVector does not determine intent, credibility or culpability. Those judgments stay with the people responsible for the investigation.

An interview grounded in the record

  1. Open the warning and the project mailbox’s access list.
  2. Check who could read the warning before work began.
  3. Compare each account with the timestamps.

Keep the investigation’s records contained.

Agree on the authorized collection and on who can search, see sources, export or administer. Handle gaps in the collection explicitly.

Review the processing boundary

Make the next inquiry easier to organize.

CloseVector configures the existing platform around the questions your investigators need to answer. Test representative records and competing accounts, then agree on the training and operating responsibility for continuing use.

How an engagement works

What your team gets

  • A source-linked review of what supports each account, what contradicts it, what’s missing and what to ask for next.
  • The system, installed on hardware you own, with training and support.

What needs to be established?

Discuss Your Project